The SQL commands are similar and they have the same result: removing the records from the table. The question about the difference is often asked from freshers and in interviews as well. The difference is pretty simple but people confuse it because they see the same result of both queries.

The list of the differences are the next:

Why the second variant? And why “the peak of stolidity”? Because it is about one of the advertising of Gold Corporation, the gold in Roșia Montanã, someone's unlimited greed with no limits, and a second part of an older article.

Today they have started running at television a new Gold Corporation advertising. Knowing the way of thinking of that individuals it can only be a part of a new campaign of train (meaning fooling, you know how, a fooling like the donkey you make to move where you want if you put in his face a carrot hanged on a stick) of Romanian public opinion. Of course, the donkey will never reach that carrot, as well the Romanian will never reach to the money promised by Gabriel Resources. It's only dust in the wide open eyes at the hearing of the exorbitant sum of 4 billion. It's worth less than the paper you are writing “four billion”.

It’s hard to believe that a monopolist company like Google could be frightened by the new search engines (as Bing or the one Facebook is developing), or even their combination with Yahoo (especially because the Yahoo accepted that their own search engine to be replaced by Bing). But, evan so, just a couple of months after, Google announced it is tweaking a new technology to search online with the code name „Caffeine”, that could change the position the companies are holding in the search results. To that companies and persons that makes good money or they are surviving according the traffic generated by Google, the new technology represent a motive of worry.

To commemorate the 40th Anniversary of the Apollo 11 Mission, NASA has released the source code of the software for the Apollo Guidance Computer, that helped man set foot on Moon, under the GNU GPLv2 license.

The Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) was the first recognizably modern embedded system, used in real-time by astronaut pilots to collect and provide flight information, and to automatically control all of the navigational functions of the Apollo spacecraft. It was developed in the early 1960s for the Apollo program by the MIT Instrumentation Laboratory.

We were reading about the Workbench of MySql on their webpage (http://www.MySql.com/products/workbench/) when we decided that we wanted to know about the effects Sun Microsystem purchasing of MySql and later the Oracle purchasing Sun Microsystem.

When Sun purchased MySql in January 2008 (for approximately 1 billion USD), MySql annual revenue was in the range of $50 million and growing rapidly, having millions of global deployments including Facebook, Google, Nokia, Baidu and China Mobile. It was desired to bring synergies to Sun that would change the landscape of the software industry by driving new adoption of MySql's open source database in more traditional applications and enterprises. The integration with Sun would greatly extend the commercial appeal of MySql's offerings and improve its value proposition with the addition of Sun's global services organization.

Since then, Schwartz oversaw continued MySql growth in spite of a disasterous release of version 5.1, the exodus the key project developers, the resignation of MySql co-founders Michael "Monty" Widenius and David Axmark as well as MySql CEO Marten Mickos, and no fewer than three major forks of the GPL’d database.

The nearby poster and the following text are a part of the Mindbomb campaign to save Roșia Montana as a response to the crazy campaign for the exploit of the resources there.

“The MindBomb campaign for Roşia Montană puts the problem of the environment pollution in Romania in relation with the corruption with no face of the state and the local administrations, not in the last place of the individual, that erode from the inside the Romanian society.

12,000 posters were glued during the night of 19/20 of march on the streets of Cluj, Bucharest, Constanţa, Timişoara, Arad, Bistriţa, Sibiu, Alba Iulia, Deva, Baia Mare, Oradea, Târgu Mureş, Sighişoara, Petroşani, Valea Arieşului, Abrud, Câmpeni and Roşia Montană.

Through the MindBomb campaign for Roşia Montană we protest against the project of intensive mining exploitation with cyanides and against the advertisement that Gabriel Resources, the owner of Roşia Montană Gold Corporation (RMGC), is making to this extremely noxious project for Romania.

The intoxication with the propaganda for the company Gabriel Resources on the televisions and written media has as purpose to adorn the Romanians opinion of the image of Roşia Montană Gold Corporation, a company remained in the era of brutal colonialism, whom cynic politics of profit will obliterate Roşia Montană from the face of the Earth, will displace people and will erase the history of this place.

For the first time in Romania the public opinion and some public institutions stood together against a damaging business for all of us, demonstrating so that Romania is no longer the paradise of crooks.

The project for intense mining exploitation with cyanides puts in danger the LIFE in the Country of Moţ, opening the path to produce the biggest ecological disaster in Eastern Europe. As so many times in recent history, the big companies, supported by the politicians, works against the people to dishonest enrich some cynic individuals. After they the flood!

We have got used not to trust in authorities after so many years, no matter if it is about the government or the presidency. We have hoped, for the same amount of years, that, in one day, the authorities will regain our lost trust. That is why we believe in the need of dialog between the civil society and administration.

We don't want Revolution, We Want Evolution!

At the MindBomb campaign for Roşia Montană participated, in different ways (conception, debate, ideas, achievement, glue) over 300 artists, designers, architects, IT specialists, writers, students and collaborators from the cities in where the posters were glued.

DON'T LET ROȘIA MONTANĂ DIE!

The people are more important than gold!

SAVE ROȘIA MONTANĂ!

MindBombwww.rosiamontana.org ”

 

No, it has nothing to do with the latest movie from the Terminator series. At least not directly and not yet: there are no robots and artificial intelligence involved here. It involves genetics, yes, but the genetics of plants.

The Terminator Technology genetically engineers plants to produce sterile seeds at harvest. It was developed by the multinational seed/agrochemical industry and the US government to prevent farmers from re-planting harvested seed and force them to buy seed each season instead. Terminator is sometimes called Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURTs) - the broad term that refers to the use of an external chemical inducer to control the expression of a plant’s genetic traits.

Apomixis is a naturally occurring form of asexual reproduction in which plant embryos grow from egg cells without fertilisation by pollen. Genetic engineers have transferred the genes conferring apomixis from a wild grass species into maize. By using apomixis breeders could dramatically reduce the high cost of producing hybrid seed.

The combination of switchable promoters with apomixis enables the creation of seed that would produce viable plants that would grow and produce viable seed only when treated with chemicals. Rather than the annual cost of producing hybrid seed, the companies that hold the patents for these technologies would simply need to produce the seed once, and then extract the costs from farmers through the chemicals to switch on the traits, including the apomictic trait, each season.

How does the terminator technology work?

The technology in the patent could be applied in a number of ways, but in general, it involves three steps:

1. Scientists add terminator genes to a crop.

2. The seed company initiates the terminator process before selling the seeds by adding an inducer.

3. Farmers plant seeds, grow plants and harvest mature, but sterile seeds.

The technology's success depends on a cleverly controlled sequence of interactions among the spliced-in genes. The last engineered gene comes into play very late in seed development when a special switch under the control of the inducer turns on the gene causing it to produce toxin. The toxin kills the embryo that is part of each mature seed.

Stories of artificial helpers and companions likewise attempts to create them have a long history, but fully autonomous machines appeared only in the 20th century. The word “robot” originates from the Czech word for forced labor, or serf. It was introduced by playwright Karel Capek (into his play R.U.R. – Rossum's Universal Robots which opened in Prague in January 1921), whose fictional robotic inventions were much like Dr. Frankenstein's monster – creatures created by chemical and biological, rather than mechanical, methods.

In fact, in an essay written in 1935, Capek strongly fought that this idea was at all possible and, writing in the third person, said:

“It is with horror, frankly, that he rejects all responsibility for the idea that metal contraptions could ever replace human beings, and that by means of wires they could awaken something like life, love, or rebellion. He would deem this dark prospect to be either an overestimation of machines, or a grave offence against life.”

[The Author of Robots Defends Himself - Karl Capek, Lidove noviny, June 9, 1935, translation: Bean Comrada]

In R.U.R., Capek poses a paradise, where the machines initially bring so many benefits but in the end bring an equal amount of blight in the form of unemployment and social unrest.

The play was an enormous success and productions soon opened throughout Europe and the U.S. R.U.R's theme, in part, was the dehumanization of man in a technological civilization.

There is some evidence that the word robot was actually coined by Karl's brother Josef, a writer in his own right. In a short letter, Capek writes that he asked Josef what he should call the artificial workers in his new play. Karel suggested “labori”, which he thinks too 'bookish' and his brother mutters "then call them robots" and turns back to his work, and so from a curt response we have the word robot.

But the current mechanical robots of popular culture are not much different from these fictional biological creations.

Robotics is the science and technology of robots and their design, manufacture, and application. Robotics is related to electronics, mechanics and software.

Basically a robot consists of:

• A mechanical device such as a wheeled platform, arms, wing, legs or other construction of any kind capable of interacting with its environment
• Sensors on or around the device that are able to sense the environment and give useful feedback to the device
• Systems that process sensory input in the context of the device's current situation and instruct the device to perform actions in response to the situation

They main function are in the fields of:

Safety: Robotics have been developed to handle nuclear and radioactive chemicals for many different uses including nuclear weapons, power plants, environmental cleanup, and the processing of certain drugs and to control heavy and/or dangerous machineries.

Unpleasantness: Robots perform many tasks that are unpleasant but necessary, such as welding or janitorial work.

Repetition and precision: Assembly line work has been one of the main fields of activity of the robotics industry. Robots are used extensively in manufacturing in various fields of the industry and, more glamorously, in space exploration, where minimum maintenance requirements are emphasized.

Mechanical platforms – the hardware base

A robot consists of two main parts: the robot body and some form of artificial intelligence (AI) system. Many different body parts can be called a robot. Articulated arms are used in welding and painting; gantry and conveyor systems move parts in factories; and giant robotic machines move earth deep inside mines. One of the most interesting aspects of robots in general is their behavior, which requires a form of intelligence. The simplest behavior of a robot is locomotion. Typically, wheels are used as the underlying mechanism to make a robot move from one point to the next. And some force such as electricity is required to make the wheels turn under command.

Actuation

Actuators are the „muscles” of a robot, the parts which convert the stored energy into movement. By far the most popular actuators are the electric motors, but there are many others powered by electricity, chemicals, and compressed air.

Motors

A variety of electric motors provide power to robots, allowing them to move material, parts, tools, or specialized devices with various programmed motions. The efficiency rating of a motor describes how much of the electricity consumed is converted to mechanical energy. Following there are some of the mechanical devices that are currently being used in modern robotics technology.

Driving mechanisms

Gears and chains: Gears and chains are mechanical platforms that provide a strong and accurate way to transmit rotary motion from one place to another, possibly changing it along the way. The speed change between two gears depends upon the number of teeth on each gear. When a powered gear goes through a full rotation, it pulls the chain by the number of teeth on that gear.

Pulleys and belts: Pulleys and belts, two other types of mechanical platforms used in robots, work the same way as gears and chains. Pulleys are wheels with a groove around the edge, and belts are the rubber loops that fit in that groove.

Gearboxes: A gearbox operates on the same principles as the gear and chain, without the chain. Gearboxes require closer tolerances, since instead of using a large loose chain to transfer force and adjust for mis-alignments, the gears mesh directly with each other. Examples of gearboxes can be found on the transmission in a car, the timing mechanism in a grandfather clock, and the paper-feed of your printer.

 Power supplies

Power supplies are generally provided by two types of battery. Primary batteries are used once and then discarded; secondary batteries operate from a (mostly) reversible chemical reaction and can be recharged several times. Primary batteries have higher density and a lower self-discharge rate. Secondary (rechargeable) batteries have less energy than primary batteries, but can be recharged up to a thousand times depending on their chemistry and environment. Typically the first use of a rechargeable battery gives 4 hours of continuous operation in an application or robot.

Electronic control

There are two major hardware platforms in a robot. The mechanical platform of unregulated voltages, power and back-EMF spikes, and the electronic platform of clean power and 5-volt signals. These two platforms need to be bridged in order for digital logic to control mechanical systems. The classic component for this is a bridge relay. A control signal generates a magnetic field in the relay's coil that physically closes a switch. MOSFETs, for example, are highly efficient silicon switches, available in many sizes like the transistor that can operate as a solid state relay to control the mechanical systems.

On the other hand, larger sized robots may require a PMDC motor in which the value of the MOSFET's “on” resistance Rds(on) results in great increases in the heat dissipation of the chip, thereby significantly reducing the chip's heat temperature. Junction temperatures within the MOSFET and the coefficients of conduction of the MOSFET package and heat sink are other important characteristics of PMDC motors.

Open source robot control software

OROCOS (Open RObot COntrol Software) is an effort to start up an open source robot control software project. Broad discussions are being held about what experiences, code and tools can be re-used from other projects, what open standards should be integrated into the project and what organizational structure is most appropriate for the project. Goals of the project are to develop robot control software as follows:

- Under open source and/or free software license(s)

- As modular as possible

- Of the highest quality (from both technical and software engineering perspectives)

- Independent of (but compatible with) commercial robot manufacturers

- For all sorts of robotic devices and computer platforms

- Localized for all programming languages

- Featuring configurable software components for kinematics, dynamics, planning, sensing, control, hardware interfacing, etc.

The project aims to become more than just a copy of existing commercial robot controllers or robot simulation/programming packages. The OROCOS project wants to develop shareable libraries, stand-alone components (sometimes referred to as software agents), and a configurable run-time environment from which to eliminate and control all distributed robotics systems. These types of projects are useful in several ways:

- For re-using code

- For use as an independent sub-system

- For copying their organizational structure

- For learning from the experience of managing an open source project

- For designing and developing extensible and reusable software

A short history:

First century A.D. and earlier

Significance: Descriptions of more than 100 machines and automata, including a fire engine, a wind organ, a coin-operated machine, and a steam-powered engine, in Pneumatica and Automata by Heron of Alexandria

Inventator: Ctesibius, Philo of Byzantium, Heron of Alexandria, and others

1206

Significance: programable Humanoid Automatons

The name: Boat with four musicians Inventor: Al-Jazari

circa 1495

Significance: Designs for a humanoid robot

The name: Mechanical knight Inventor: Leonardo da Vinci

1738

Significance: Mechanical duck that was able to eat, flap its wings, and excrete

The name: Digesting Duck Inventor: Jacques de Vaucanson

1800s

Significance: Japanese mechanical toys that served tea, fired arrows, and painted

The name: Karakuri toys Inventor: Tanaka Hisashige

1921

Significance: First fictional automatons called “robots” appear in the play R.U.R.

The name: Rossum's Universal Robots Inventor: Karel Capek

anii 1930

Significance: Humanoid robot exhibited at the 1939 and 1940 Worlds' Fairs

The name: Elektro Inventor: Westinghouse Electric Corporation

1948

Significance: Simple robots exhibiting biological behaviors

The name: Elsie and Elmer Inventor: William Grey Walter

1956

Significance: First commercial robot, from the Unimation company founded by George Devol and Joseph Engelberg based on Devol's patents

The name: Unimate nventor: George Devol

1961

Significance: First installed industrial robot

The name: Unimate Inventor: George Devol

1963

Significance: First palletizing robot

The name: Palletizer Inventor: Fuji Yusoki Kogyo

1973

Significance: First industrial robot with six electromechanically driven axes

The name: Famulus Inventor: Kuka Robot Group

1975

Significance: Programmable universal manipulation arm, a Unimation product

The name: Puma Inventor: Victor Scheinman

Industrial robots

Though not humanoid in form, machines with flexible behaviour and a few humanlike physical attributes have been developed for industry. The first stationary industrial robot was the programmable Unimate, an electronically controlled hydraulic heavy-lifting arm that could repeat arbitrary sequences of motions. It was invented in 1954 by the American engineer George Devol and was developed by Unimation Inc., a company founded in 1956 by American engineer Joseph Engelberger. In 1959 a prototype of the Unimate was introduced in a General Motors Corporation die-casting factory in Trenton, New Jersey. In 1961 Condec Corp. (after purchasing Unimation the preceding year) delivered the world’s first production-line robot to the GM factory; it had the unsavoury task (for humans) of removing and stacking hot metal parts from a die-casting machine. Unimate arms continue to be developed and sold by licensees around the world, with the automobile industry remaining the largest buyer.

Starting from that idea, the robots had developed into various forms and designs, in order to accomplish different tasks. Their interaction with the environment improved considerably.

Sensing - Touch

Current robotic and prosthetic hands receive far less tactile information than the human hand. Recent research has developed a tactile sensor array that mimics the mechanical properties and touch receptors of human fingertips. The sensor array is constructed as a rigid core surrounded by conductive fluid contained by an elastomeric skin. Electrodes are mounted on the surface of the rigid core and are connected to an impedance-measuring device within the core. When the artificial skin touches an object the fluid path around the electrodes is deformed, producing impedance changes that map the forces received from the object. The researchers expect that an important function of such artificial fingertips will be adjusting robotic grip on held objects.

Environmental interaction and navigation

Robots also require navigation hardware and software in order to anticipate on their environment. In particular unforeseen events (eg people and other obstacles that are not stationary) can cause problems or collisions. Some highly advanced robots as ASIMO, EveR-1, Meinu robot have particular good robot navigation hardware and software. Also, the self-controlled cars, Ernst Dickmanns' driverless car and the entries in the DARPA Grand Challenge are capable of sensing the environment well and make navigation decisions based on this information. Most of the robots include regular a GPS navigation device with waypoints, along with radar, sometimes combined with other sensor data such as LIDAR, video cameras and inertial guidance systems for better navigation in between waypoints.

Manipulation

Robots which must work in the real world require some way to manipulate objects; pick up, modify, destroy, or otherwise have an effect. Thus the 'hands' of a robot are often referred to as end effectors, while the arm is referred to as a manipulator. Most robot arms have replaceable effectors, each allowing them to perform some small range of tasks. Some have a fixed manipulator which can not be replaced, while a few have one very general purpose manipulator, for example a humanoid hand.

Rolling robots

For simplicity, most mobile robots have four wheels. However, some researchers have tried to create more complex wheeled robots, with only one or two wheels. The sci-fi movies have been proposed motorcycles robots, as they appear in the latest Terminator movie (“Terminator Salvation”).

Walking robots

Walking is a difficult and dynamic problem to solve. Several robots have been made which can walk reliably on two legs, however none have yet been made which are as robust as a human. Many other robots have been built that walk on more than two legs, due to these robots being significantly easier to construct. Hybrids too have been proposed in movies as “I robot”, where they walk on 2 legs and switch to 4 (arms+legs) when going to a sprint. Typically, robots on 2 legs can walk well on flat floors, and can occasionally walk up stairs. None can walk over rocky, uneven terrain.

Flying

A modern passenger airliner is essentially a flying robot, with two humans to manage it. The autopilot can control the plane for each stage of the journey, including takeoff, normal flight, and even landing. Other flying robots are uninhabited, and are known as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). They can be smaller and lighter without a human pilot onboard, and fly into dangerous territory for military surveillance missions. Some can even fire on targets under command. UAVs are also being developed which can fire on targets automatically, without the need for a command from a human. However these robots are unlikely to see service in the foreseeable future because of the morality issues involved. Other flying robots include cruise missiles, the Entomopter and the Epson micro helicopter robot. Robots such as the Air Penguin, Air Ray and Air Jelly have lighter-than-air bodies, propelled by paddles, and guided by sonar.

Snaking

Several snake robots have been successfully developed. Mimicking the way real snakes move, these robots can navigate very confined spaces, meaning they may one day be used to search for people trapped in collapsed buildings. The Japanese ACM-R5 snake robot can even navigate both on land and in water.

Skating

A small number of skating robots have been developed, one of which is a multi-mode walking and skating device, Titan VIII. It has four legs, with unpowered wheels, which can either step or roll. Another robot, Plen, can use a miniature skateboard or rollerskates, and skate across a desktop.

Climbing

Several different approaches have been used to develop robots that have the ability to climb vertical surfaces. One approach mimicks the movements of a human climber on a wall with protrusions; adjusting the center of the mass and moving each limb in turn to gain leverage. An example of this is Capuchin, built by Stanford University, California. Another approach uses the specialised toe pad method of wall-climbing geckoes, which can run on smooth surfaces such as vertical glass. Examples of this approach include Wallbot and Stickybot. A third approach is to mimick the motion of a snake climbing a pole.

Swimming

It is calculated that when swimming some fish can achieve a propulsive efficiency greater than 90%. Furthermore, they can accelerate and maneuver far better than any man-made boat or submarine and produce less noise and water disturbance. Therefore, many researchers studying underwater robots would like to copy this type of locomotion. Notable examples are the Essex University Computer Science Robotic Fish and the Robot Tuna built by the Institute of field robotics to analyze and mathematically model thunniform motion. The Aqua Penguin, designed and built by Festo of Germany, copies the streamlined shape and propulsion by front “flippers” of penguins. Festo have also built the Aqua Ray and Aqua Jelly, which emulate the locomotion of manta ray, and jellyfish, respectively.

Human interaction

If robots are to work effectively in homes and other non-industrial environments, the way they are instructed to perform their jobs, and especially how they will be told to stop will be of critical importance. The people who interact with them may have little or no training in robotics, and so any interface will need to be extremely intuitive. Science fiction authors also typically assume that robots will eventually be capable of communicating with humans through speech, gestures and facial expressions, rather than a command-line interface. Although speech would be the most natural way for the human to communicate, it is quite unnatural for the robot. It will be quite a while before robots interact as naturally as the fictional C-3PO or the Terminators.

Robot research

Much of the research in robotics focuses not on specific industrial tasks, but on investigations into new types of robots, alternative ways to think about or design robots, and new ways to manufacture them.

A first particular new innovation in robot design is composed from the open sourcing of robot-projects. To describe the level of advancement of a robot, the term Generation Robots can be used. This term is coined by the professor Hans Moravec, pioneer in mobile robot research and principal research scientist at/founder of the Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute in describing the near future evolution of robot technology.

First generation robots, as Moravec predicted in 1997, a generation of broadly-capable “universal robots” – the “servant” robots, will be able to run application programs for many simple chores and should have an intellectual capacity (mental power and inflexible behavior) comparable to perhaps a lizard (or other small reptile) and should become available by 2010.

As Moravec's predictions, in 2015 the utility robots will host programs for several tasks. Larger “Utility Robot” with manipulator arms able to run several different programs to perform different tasks may follow single-purpose home robots. Their tens of billion calculation per second computers would support narrow inflexible competences, perhaps comparable to the skills of an amphibian, like a frog.

Because the first generation robot would be incapable of learning, however, professor Moravec predicts that the second generation robot would be an improvement over the first and become available by 2020, with an intelligence maybe comparable to that of a mouse. Robot competence will become comparable to larger mammals. In the decades following the first universal robots, a second generation with mammallike brainpower and cognitive ability will emerge. They will have a conditioned learning mechanism, and steer among alternative paths in their application programs on the basis of past experience, gradually adapting to their special circumstances.

The third generation robot (about 2030) should have an intelligence comparable to small primates and maintain physical, cultural and psychological models of their world to mentally rehearse and optimize tasks before physically performing them.

A fourth generation, humanlike – robots with human intelligence, will abstract and reason from the world model. Moravec does not predict this happening before around 2040 or 2050.

The second particular new innovation is Evolutionary Robotics. This is a methodology that uses evolutionary computation to help design robots, especially the body form, or motion and behavior controllers. In a similar way to natural evolution, a large population of robots is allowed to compete in some way, or their ability to perform a task is measured using a fitness function. Those that perform worst are removed from the population and replaced by a new set, which have new behaviors based on those of the winners. Over time the population improves, and eventually a satisfactory robot may appear. This happens without any direct programming of the robots by the researchers. Researchers use this method both to create better robots and to explore the nature of evolution. Because the process often requires many generations of robots to be simulated, this technique may be run entirely or mostly in simulation, then tested on real robots once the evolved algorithms are good enough. Currently, there are about 1 million industrial robots toiling around the world, and Japan is the top country having high density of utilizing robots in its manufacturing industry.

According to Hans Moravec, our robot creations are evolving similar to how life on Earth evolved, only at warp speed. By his calculations, by the middle of the century no human task, physical or intellectual, will be beyond the scope of robots. If Moravec is correct in his predictions, it won’t be long before robots will have cognition. With daily breakthroughs happening in the robotic community, it may happen even sooner. They will be able to think autonomously and the robot intelligence and capabilities would equal (and most likely quickly surpass) any human capability.

That likely possibility begs the question: what happens when robots are superior to their creators? The sci-fi movies have “studied” the problem for some time with different and very various stories: the popular “robot takeover”, or humans evolving into advance robots, combining the organic and anorganic, or even escaping the biological tissues and becoming fully anorganic robots but retaining their entities. That idea seems much further away, but whatever the case may be, there are changes ahead. Until now the organic computers (the life) had the absolute supremacy on this planet, but it is going to change.

The war for the gold from Roşia Montană has been reopened. An aggressive advertising that speaks of a 4 billion dollars benefit have been broadcasted continuously at the television as a part of the campaigned run in the last few weeks by Gabriel Resources. These individuals have tried in the last few years to exploit the gold in the area, but they have been blocked in the court of law, they lost the lawsuits.

The seven lost lawsuits have the next terminal sentences:

2. The High Court of Causation and Justice, by the decision 4607/2008, cancels the Certificate of archaeological load discharge for the Mountain Carnic. Because of this, the core of the mining project, where it exists the most gold concentration, is protected by law, the exploitation could not start without this certificate. The company tries to obtain a new one, for the same perimeter, and illegal one, from the Minister of Culture.

4. The Appellate Court Alba cancels the contract of cooperation between the town hall of Roşia Montana and the company RMGC about the construction of the emplacement of migration Piatra Albã – New Roşia Montană.

6. The Appellate Court Cluj decides, by terminal decision, the annulment the second urbanism certificate released by the District Council Alba.

The project for the Google web browser was launched on some comic books created by Scott McCloud - http://blogoscoped.com/google-chrome/.